Skip navigation

Category Archives: Controversy

Nafissatou DialloIMF Ex-Chief Globaltrotter NYC Riker’s Jailbird accused in sexcrimes Dominique Strauss-Kahn France President napoleonic ambitions A New York court has dismissed charges of sexual assault against former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-KahnDominique Strauss-Kahn, which means the criminal case against him is now closed.The news comes after New York City prosecutors asked that all criminal charges against the former International Monetary Fund leader be dismissed because they were not certain beyond a reasonable doubt that the hotel maid who had accused him of sexual assault was telling the truth The 33-year-old West African maid claimed Strauss-Kahn attacked her and sexually assaulted her in his luxury suite on May 14 View next as Dominique Strauss-Kahn, ex IMF DIR GEN – a failed jailbird in NYC accused as sexual predator.

Total Jihad Vanity Testament Osama bin Laden Phantom Holy War Terror Double Jeapardy Fog of War Faided Legacy
]Osama bin Laden Exclusive Jihad Interview Osama bin Laden exclusive interview in 1998 on Jihad as visual portrait while he was shot dead in his mansion compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan and buried in Arabic Sea to prevent martyr cult –
the Pentagon said the body was placed into the waters of the northern Arabian Sea after adhering to traditional Islamic procedures – including washing the corpse – aboard the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson.

lara loganLara Logan is breaking her silence about the sexual assault she endured in Tahrir Square speaking out about suffering a “brutal and sustained sexual assault”
The long-time journalist feared for her life during the attack.In an interview with the New York Times, Logan said that “for an extended period of time they raped me with their hands.”
“There was no doubt in my mind that I was in the process of dying. I thought not only am I going to die, but it’s going to be just a torturous death that’s going to go on forever,” she explained to CBS correspondent Scott Pelley.
Lara Logan talks to Scott Pelley about the sexual assault she endured while covering the Egyptian revolution in February 2011. 60 Minutes, Sunday, May 1, 7 p.m. Thoughts of her two young children helped reinforce her determination to survive the assault, she says, which finally ended when she was rescued by a group of Egyptian women and soldiers. The soldiers drove her and her team back to their hotel, where she was examined by a doctor. She returned to the U.S. the next day and went directly into a hospital, where she was treated for four days.
When Logan saw her children, “I felt like I had been given a second chance that I didn’t deserve…because I did that to them. I came so close to leaving them, to abandoning them,” she says.

The 9/11 first responders bill passed by unanimous consent by the Senate. View Technologos Digital Archives In Memoriam 9/11 WTC noncontroversial docdrama shooting gateaway to hell firefighters Inside 9/11 WTC Ground Zero who are now entitled to free medical treatment.
Midnight at Ground Zero
Forthnight after the World Trade Center tragedy the Wall St. area was re-opened to those of us who worked or lived there. This short film is a record of what going to work that night was like.
In Memorium to those who lost their lives and those who sacrificed their health to find the victims remnants
The compromise agreement dedicate a total of $4.2 billion over a 10-year period, $1.5 billion of the cost goes for health benefits and $2.7 billion will pay for compensation for health woes of emergency responders. The agreement also caps attorneys’ fees at 10 percent of any total compensation award, and prevents individuals from making multiple claims for benefits.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/12/22/911.bill/index.html

Chinese Dissident Liu Xiaobo Receives Nobel Prize in Absentia and global digital dissident Wikileaks Editor Julia Assange webcinema news recent intrv with David Frost on his problems with Swede’s prosecution http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/frostovertheworld/2010/12/201012228384924314.html
with comments by legendary Pentagon whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg.

Assange Interview on his high-tech prison mansion on his alleged sexcirimes and messianic total freedom digital transparency ambitions.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9309000/9309320.stm

Below is censored in China cinematic news portrait of Liu Xiaobo 刘晓波 劉曉波

Liu Xiaobo 刘晓波 劉曉波 Chinese Dissident whose trial and verdict Won Him Nobel Prize for 2010
Julian Assange Wikileaks Cablegate Digital Censorship by jailbirding him.
Wikileaks Chief Editor Julian Assange docdrama narrated and shot by his excollegues at Wikileaks while his arrest is a sign of global digital media censorship while he was entrapped with improper sex accusations controversy launched his Cablegate gauntlet of intellectual challenge revenge to global digital media censorship empire.

Julian Assange Wikileaks Cablegate Digital Censorship by jailbirding him.
Wikileaks Chief Editor Julian Assange arrest is a sign of global digital media censorship while he was entrapped with improper sex accusations launched his Cablegate gauntlet of intellectual challenge revenge to global digital media censorship empire.
Julian Assange Oslo Free Press Forum Address On Censorship where he was entrapped in sex escapades that led to his arrest in London. View next a gag censored as tagged adult feature audience by dailymotion a Wikileaks Afghan War Logs Weakling Assange Controversy discussed.
The diplomatic cables reveal how the US uses its embassies as part of a global espionage network, with diplomats tasked to obtain not just information from the people they meet, but personal details, such as frequent flyer numbers, credit card details and even DNA material.
Julian Assange On Afghan War Logs With Larry King.

Censored in China cinematic news portrait Liu Xiaobo 刘晓波 劉曉波 Liu Xiaobo 刘晓波 劉曉波 Chinese Dissident whose trial and verdict Won Him Nobel Prize for 2010

while a norwegian Nobel Committee restored it’s own legacy credibility and moral authority leadership tarnished by nominating Obama with a prize last year as advance to his future peace initiatives Liu Xiaobo Discusses Freedom of Expression in China
Technologos Cognitive infrastructure web medium Language forms Designer Multimedia Filmmaker, Digital Architect, WEB LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIST creating original video archives on intellectual dissent history and underground culture in USSR (narration in original russian) http://www.viddler.com/explore/technologos/
Original Charter 08 written and published on the web by Liu Xiaobo in chinese with english translation as well Charter 08

December 09, 2008

A group of 303 Chinese writers, intellectuals, lawyers, journalists, retired Party officials, workers, peasants, and businessmen have issued an open letter — the “Charter 08” — calling for legal reforms, democracy and protection of human rights in China. An English translation of the Charter by Human Rights in China is below.

“Charter 08”
I. Preamble

This year marks 100 years since China’s [first] Constitution,1 the 60th anniversary of the promulgation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the 30th anniversary of the birth of the Democracy Wall, and the 10th year since the Chinese government signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Having experienced a prolonged period of human rights disasters and challenging and tortuous struggles, the awakening Chinese citizens are becoming increasingly aware that freedom, equality, and human rights are universal values shared by all humankind, and that democracy, republicanism, and constitutional government make up the basic institutional framework of modern politics. A “modernization” bereft of these universal values and this basic political framework is a disastrous process that deprives people of their rights, rots away their humanity, and destroys their dignity. Where is China headed in the 21st century? Will it continue with this “modernization” under authoritarian rule, or will it endorse universal values, join the mainstream civilization, and build a democratic form of government? This is an unavoidable decision.

The tremendous historic changes of the mid-19th century exposed the decay of the traditional Chinese autocratic system and set the stage for the greatest transformation China had seen in several thousand years. The Self-Strengthening Movement [1861–1895] sought improvements in China’s technical capability by acquiring manufacturing techniques, scientific knowledge, and military technologies from the West; China’s defeat in the first Sino-Japanese War [1894–1895] once again exposed the obsolescence of its system; the Hundred Days’ Reform [1898] touched upon the area of institutional innovation, but ended in failure due to cruel suppression by the die-hard faction [at the Qing court]. The Xinhai Revolution [1911], on the surface, buried the imperial system that had lasted for more than 2,000 years and established Asia’s first republic. But, because of the particular historical circumstances of internal and external troubles, the republican system of government was short lived, and autocracy made a comeback.

The failure of technical imitation and institutional renewal prompted deep reflection among our countrymen on the root cause of China’s cultural sickness, and the ensuing May Fourth [1919] and New Culture Movements [1915–1921] under the banner of “science and democracy.” But the course of China’s political democratization was forcibly cut short due to frequent civil wars and foreign invasion. The process of a constitutional government began again after China’s victory in the War of Resistance against Japan [1937–1945], but the outcome of the civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists plunged China into the abyss of modern-day totalitarianism. The “New China” established in 1949 is a “people’s republic” in name, but in reality it is a “party domain.” The ruling party monopolizes all the political, economic, and social resources. It has created a string of human rights disasters, such as the Anti-Rightist Campaign, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, June Fourth, and the suppression of unofficial religious activities and the rights defense movement, causing tens of millions of deaths, and exacting a disastrous price from both the people and the country.

The “Reform and Opening Up” of the late 20th century extricated China from the pervasive poverty and absolute totalitarianism of the Mao Zedong era, and substantially increased private wealth and the standard of living of the common people. Individual economic freedom and social privileges were partially restored, a civil society began to grow, and calls for human rights and political freedom among the people increased by the day. Those in power, while implementing economic reforms aimed at marketization and privatization, also began to shift from a position of rejecting human rights to one of gradually recognizing them. In 1997 and 1998, the Chinese government signed two important international human rights treaties.2 In 2004, the National People’s Congress amended the Constitution to add that “[the State] respects and guarantees human rights.” And this year, the government has promised to formulate and implement a “National Human Rights Action Plan.” But so far, this political progress has largely remained on paper: there are laws, but there is no rule of law; there is a constitution, but no constitutional government; this is still the political reality that is obvious to all. The ruling elite continues to insist on its authoritarian grip on power, rejecting political reform. This has caused official corruption, difficulty in establishing rule of law, the absence of of human rights, moral bankruptcy, social polarization, abnormal economic development, destruction of both the natural and cultural environment, no institutionalized protection of citizens’ rights to freedom, property, and the pursuit of happiness, the constant accumulation of all kinds of social conflicts, and the continuous surge of resentment. In particular, the intensification of antagonism between the government and the people, and the dramatic increase in mass incidents, indicate a catastrophic loss of control in the making, suggesting that the backwardness of the current system has reached a point where change must occur.
II. Our Fundamental Concepts

At this historical juncture that will decide the future destiny of China, it is necessary to reflect on the modernization process of the past hundred and some years and reaffirm the following concepts:

Freedom: Freedom is at the core of universal values. The rights of speech, publication, belief, assembly, association, movement, to strike, and to march and demonstrate are all the concrete expressions of freedom. Where freedom does not flourish, there is no modern civilization to speak of.

Human Rights: Human rights are not bestowed by a state; they are inherent rights enjoyed by every person. Guaranteeing human rights is both the most important objective of a government and the foundation of the legitimacy of its public authority; it is also the intrinsic requirement of the policy of “putting people first.” China’s successive political disasters have all been closely related to the disregard for human rights by the ruling establishment. People are the mainstay of a nation; a nation serves its people; government exists for the people.

Equality: The integrity, dignity, and freedom of every individual, regardless of social status, occupation, gender, economic circumstances, ethnicity, skin color, religion, or political belief, are equal. The principles of equality before the law for each and every person and equality in social, economic, cultural, and political rights of all citizens must be implemented.

Republicanism: Republicanism is “joint governing by all, peaceful coexistence,” that is, the separation of powers for checks and balances and the balance of interests; that is, a community comprising many diverse interests, different social groups, and a plurality of cultures and faiths, seeking to peacefully handle public affairs on the basis of equal participation, fair competition, and joint discussion.

Democracy: The most fundamental meaning is that sovereignty resides in the people and the government elected by the people. Democracy has the following basic characteristics:(1) The legitimacy of political power comes from the people; the source of political power is the people. (2) Political control is exercised through choices made by the people. (3) Citizens enjoy the genuine right to vote; officials in key positions at all levels of government must be the product of elections at regular intervals. (4) Respect the decisions of the majority while protecting the basic human rights of the minority. In a word, democracy is the modern public instrument for creating a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

Constitutionalism: Constitutionalism is the principle of guaranteeing basic freedoms and rights of citizens as defined by the constitution through legal provisions and the rule of law, restricting and defining the boundaries of government power and conduct, and providing appropriate institutional capability to carry this out. In China, the era of imperial power is long gone, never to return; in the world at large, the authoritarian system is on the wane; citizens ought to become the true masters of their states. The fundamental way out for China lies only in dispelling the subservient notion of reliance on “enlightened rulers” and “upright officials,” promoting public consciousness of rights as fundamental and participation as a duty, and putting into practice freedom, engaging in democracy, and respecting the law.
III. Our Basic Positions

Thus, in the spirit of responsible and constructive citizens, we put forth the following specific positions regarding various aspects of state administration, citizens’ rights and interests, and social development:

1. Constitutional Amendment: Based on the aforementioned values and concepts, amend the Constitution, deleting clauses in the current Constitution that are not in conformity with the principle that sovereignty resides in the people, so that the Constitution can truly become a document that guarantees human rights and allows for the exercise of public power, and become the enforceable supreme law that no individual, group, or party can violate, establishing the foundation of the legal authority for democratizing China.

2. Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances: Construct a modern government that separates powers and maintains checks and balances among them, that guarantees the separation of legislative, judicial, and executive powers. Establish the principle of statutory administration and responsible government to prevent excessive expansion of executive power; government should be responsible to taxpayers; establish the system of separation of powers and checks and balances between the central and local governments; the central power must be clearly defined and mandated by the Constitution, and
the localities must exercise full autonomy.

3. Legislative Democracy: Legislative bodies at all levels should be created through direct elections; maintain the principle of fairness and justice in making law; and implement legislative democracy.

4. Judicial Independence: The judiciary should transcend partisanship, be free from any interference, exercise judicial independence, and guarantee judicial fairness; it should establish a constitutional court and a system to investigate violations of the Constitution, and uphold the authority of the Constitution. Abolish as soon as possible the Party’s Committees of Political and Legislative Affairs at all levels that seriously endanger the country’s rule of law. Prevent private use of public instruments.

5. Public Use of Public Instruments: Bring the armed forces under state control. Military personnel should render loyalty to the Constitution and to the country. Political party organizations should withdraw from the armed forces; raise the professional standards of the armed forces. All public employees including the police should maintain political neutrality. Abolish discrimination in hiring of public employees based on party affiliation; there should be equality in hiring regardless of party affiliation.

6. Human Rights Guarantees: Guarantee human rights in earnest; protect human dignity. Set up a Commission on Human Rights, responsible to the highest organ of popular will, to prevent government abuse of public authority and violations of human rights, and, especially, to guarantee the personal freedom of citizens. No one shall suffer illegal arrest, detention, subpoena, interrogation, or punishment. Abolish the Reeducation-Through-Labor system.

7. Election of Public Officials: Fully implement the system of democratic elections to realize equal voting rights based on “one person, one vote.” Systematically and gradually implement direct elections of administrative heads at all levels. Regular elections based on free competition and citizen participation in elections for legal public office are inalienable basic human rights.

8. Urban-Rural Equality: Abolish the current urban-rural two-tier household registration system to realize the constitutional right of equality before the law for all citizens and guarantee the citizens’ right to move freely.

9. Freedom of Association: Guarantee citizens’ right to freedom of association. Change the current system of registration upon approval for community groups to a system of record-keeping. Lift the ban on political parties. Regulate party activities according to the Constitution and law; abolish the privilege of one-party monopoly on power; establish the principles of freedom of activities of political parties and fair competition for political parties; normalize and legally regulate party politics.

10. Freedom of Assembly: Freedoms to peacefully assemble, march, demonstrate, and express [opinions] are citizens’ fundamental freedoms stipulated by the Constitution; they should not be subject to illegal interference and unconstitutional restrictions by the ruling party and the government.

11. Freedom of Expression: Realize the freedom of speech, freedom to publish, and academic freedom; guarantee the citizens’ right to know and right to supervise [public institutions]. Enact a “News Law” and a “Publishing Law,” lift the ban on reporting, repeal the “crime of inciting subversion of state power” clause in the current Criminal Law, and put an end to punishing speech as a crime.

12. Freedom of Religion: Guarantee freedom of religion and freedom of belief, and implement separation of religion and state so that activities involving religion and faith are not subjected to government interference. Examine and repeal administrative statutes, administrative rules, and local statutes that restrict or deprive citizens of religious freedom; ban management of religious activities by administrative legislation. Abolish the system that requires that religious groups (and including places of worship) obtain prior approval of their legal status in order to register, and replace it with a system of record-keeping that requires no scrutiny.

13. Civic Education: Abolish political education and political examinations that are heavy on ideology and serve the one-party rule. Popularize civic education based on universal values and civil rights, establish civic consciousness, and advocate civic virtues that serve society.

14. Property Protection: Establish and protect private property rights, and implement a system based on a free and open market economy; guarantee entrepreneurial freedom, and eliminate administrative monopolies; set up a Committee for the Management of State-Owned Property, responsible to the highest organ of popular will; launch reform of property rights in a legal and orderly fashion, and clarify the ownership of property rights and those responsible; launch a new land movement, advance land privatization, and guarantee in earnest the land property rights of citizens, particularly the farmers.

15. Fiscal Reform: Democratize public finances and guarantee taxpayers’ rights. Set up the structure and operational mechanism of a public finance system with clearly defined authority and responsibilities, and establish a rational and effective system of decentralized financial authority among various levels of government; carry out a major reform of the tax system, so as to reduce tax rates, simplify the tax system, and equalize the tax burden. Administrative departments may not increase taxes or create new taxes at will without sanction by society obtained through a public elective process and resolution by organs of popular will. Pass property rights reform to diversify and introduce competition mechanisms into the market; lower the threshold for entry into the financial field and create conditions for the development of privately-owned financial enterprises, and fully energize the financial system.

16. Social Security: Establish a social security system that covers all citizens and provides them with basic security in education, medical care, care for the elderly, and employment.

17. Environmental Protection: Protect the ecological environment, promote sustainable development, and take responsibility for future generations and all humanity; clarify and impose the appropriate responsibilities that state and government officials at all levels must take to this end; promote participation and oversight by civil society groups in environmental protection.

18. Federal Republic: Take part in maintaining regional peace and development with an attitude of equality and fairness, and create an image of a responsible great power. Protect the free systems of Hong Kong and Macau .On the premise of freedom and democracy, seek a reconciliation plan for the mainland and Taiwan through equal negotiations and cooperative interaction. Wisely explore possible paths and institutional blueprints for the common prosperity of all ethnic groups, and establish the Federal Republic of China under the framework of a democractic and constitutional government.

19. Transitional Justice: Restore the reputation of and give state compensation to individuals, as well as their families, who suffered political persecution during past political movements; release all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience; release all people convicted for their beliefs; establish a Commission for Truth Investigation to find the truth of historical events, determine responsibility, and uphold justice; seek social reconciliation on this foundation.
IV. Conclusion

China, as a great nation of the world, one of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, and a member of the Human Rights Council, ought to make its own contribution to peace for humankind and progress in human rights. Regrettably, however, of all the great nations of the world today, China alone still clings to an authoritarian way of life and has, as a result, created an unbroken nchain of human rights disasters and social crises, held back the development of the Chinese people, and hindered the progress of human civilization. This situation must change! We cannot put off political democratization reforms any longer. Therefore, in the civic spirit of daring to take action, we are issuing Charter 08. We hope that all Chinese citizens who share this sense of crisis, responsibility, and mission, whether officials or common people and regardless of social background, will put aside our differences to seek common ground and come to take an active part in this citizens’ movement, to promote the great transformation of Chinese society together, so that we can soon establish a free, democratic, and constitutional nation, fulfilling the aspirations and dreams that our countrymen have been pursuing tirelessly for more than a hundred years.

零 八 宪 章

一、前言

今年是中国立宪百年,《世界人权宣言》公布60周年,“民主墙”诞生30周年,中国政府签署《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》10周年。在经历了长期的人权灾难和艰难曲折的抗争历程之后,觉醒的中国公民日渐清楚地认识到,自由、平等、人权是人类共同的普世价值;民主、共和、宪政是现代政治的基本制度架构。抽离了这些普世价值和基本政制架构的“现代化”,是剥夺人的权利、腐蚀人性、摧毁人的尊严的灾难过程。21世纪的中国将走向何方,是继续这种威权统治下的 “现代化”,还是认同普世价值、融入主流文明、建立民主政体?这是一个不容回避的抉择。

19世纪中期的历史巨变,暴露了中国传统专制制度的腐朽,揭开了中华大地上“数千年未有之大变局”的序幕。洋务运动追求器物层面的进良,甲午战败再次暴露了体制的过时;戊戌变法触及到制度层面的革新,终因顽固派的残酷镇压而归于失败;辛亥革命在表面上埋葬了延续2000多年的皇权制度,建立了亚洲第一个共和国。囿于当时内忧外患的特定历史条件,共和政体只是昙花一现,专制主义旋即卷土重来。器物模仿和制度更新的失败,推动国人深入到对文化病根的反思,遂有以“科学与民主”为旗帜的“五四”新文化运动,因内战频仍和外敌入侵,中国政治民主化历程被迫中断。抗日战争胜利后的中国再次开启了宪政历程,然而国共内战的结果使中国陷入了现代极权主义的深渊。1949年建立的“新中国”,名义上是“人民共和国”,实质上是“党天下”。执政党垄断了所有政治、经济和社会资源,制造了反右、大跃进、文革、六四、打压民间宗教活动与维权运动等一系列人权灾难,致使数千万人失去生命,国民和国家都付出了极为惨重的代价。

二十世纪后期的“改革开放”,使中国摆脱了毛泽东时代的普遍贫困和绝对极权,民间财富和民众生活水平有了大幅度提高,个人的经济自由和社会权利得到部分恢复,公民社会开始生长,民间对人权和政治自由的呼声日益高涨。执政者也在进行走向市场化和私有化的经济改革的同时,开始了从拒绝人权到逐渐承认人权的转变。中国政府于1997年、1998年分别签署了两个重要的国际人权公约,全国人大于2004年通过修宪把“尊重和保障人权”写进宪法,今年又承诺制订和推行《国家人权行动计划》。但是,这些政治进步迄今为止大多停留在纸面上;有法律而无法治,有宪法而无宪政,仍然是有目共睹的政治现实。执政集团继续坚持维系威权统治,排拒政治变革,由此导致官场腐败,法治难立,人权不彰,道德沦丧,社会两极分化,经济畸形发展,自然环境和人文环境遭到双重破坏,公民的自由、财产和追求幸福的权利得不到制度化的保障,各种社会矛盾不断积累,不满情绪持续高涨,特别是官民对立激化和群体事件激增,正在显示着灾难性的失控趋势,现行体制的落伍已经到了非改不可的地步。

二、我们的基本理念

当此决定中国未来命运的历史关头,有必要反思百年来的现代化历程,重申如下基本理念:

自由:自由是普世价值的核心之所在。言论、出版、信仰、集会、结社、迁徙、罢工和游行示威等权利都是自由的具体体现。自由不昌,则无现代文明可言。

人权:人权不是国家的赐予,而是每个人与生俱来就享有的权利。保障人权,既是政府的首要目标和公共权力合法性的基础,也是“以人为本”的内在要求。中国的历次政治灾难都与执政当局对人权的无视密切相关。人是国家的主体,国家服务于人民,政府为人民而存在。

平等:每一个个体的人,不论社会地位、职业、性别、经济状况、种族、肤色、宗教或政治信仰,其人格、尊严、自由都是平等的。必须落实法律面前人人平等的原则,落实公民的社会、经济、文化、政治权利平等的原则。

共和:共和就是“大家共治,和平共生”,就是分权制衡与利益平衡,就是多种利益成分、不同社会集团、多元文化与信仰追求的群体,在平等参与、公平竞争、共同议政的基础上,以和平的方式处理公共事务。

民主:最基本的涵义是主权在民和民选政府。民主具有如下基本特点:(1)政权的合法性来自人民,政治权力来源于人民;(2)政治统治经过人民选择,(3)公民享有真正的选举权,各级政府的主要政务官员必须通过定期的竞选产生。(4)尊重多数人的决定,同时保护少数人的基本人权。一句话,民主使政府成为“民有,民治,民享”的现代公器。

宪政:宪政是通过法律规定和法治来保障宪法确定的公民基本自由和权利的原则,限制并划定政府权力和行为的边界,并提供相应的制度设施。

在中国,帝国皇权的时代早已一去不复返了;在世界范围内,威权体制也日近黄昏;公民应该成为真正的国家主人。祛除依赖“明君”、“清官”的臣民意识,张扬权利为本、参与为责的公民意识,实践自由,躬行民主,尊奉法治,才是中国的根本出路。

三、我们的基本主张

藉此,我们本着负责任与建设性的公民精神对国家政制、公民权利与社会发展诸方面提出如下具体主张:

1、修改宪法:根据前述价值理念修改宪法,删除现行宪法中不符合主权在民原则的条文,使宪法真正成为人权的保证书和公共权力的许可状,成为任何个人、团体和党派不得违反的可以实施的最高法律,为中国民主化奠定法权基础。

2、分权制衡:构建分权制衡的现代政府,保证立法、司法、行政三权分立。确立法定行政和责任政府的原则,防止行政权力过分扩张;政府应对纳税人负责;在中央和地方之间建立分权与制衡制度,中央权力须由宪法明确界定授权,地方实行充分自治。

3、立法民主:各级立法机构由直选产生,立法秉持公平正义原则,实行立法民主。

4、司法独立:司法应超越党派、不受任何干预,实行司法独立,保障司法公正;设立宪法法院,建立违宪审查制度,维护宪法权威。尽早撤销严重危害国家法治的各级党的政法委员会,避免公器私用。

5、公器公用:实现军队国家化,军人应效忠于宪法,效忠于国家,政党组织应从军队中退出,提高军队职业化水平。包括警察在内的所有公务员应保持政治中立。消除公务员录用的党派歧视,应不分党派平等录用。

6、人权保障:切实保障人权,维护人的尊严。设立对最高民意机关负责的人权委员会,防止政府滥用公权侵犯人权,尤其要保障公民的人身自由,任何人不受非法逮捕、拘禁、传讯、审问、处罚,废除劳动教养制度。

7、公职选举:全面推行民主选举制度,落实一人一票的平等选举权。各级行政首长的直接选举应制度化地逐步推行。定期自由竞争选举和公民参选法定公共职务是不可剥夺的基本人权。

8、城乡平等:废除现行的城乡二元户籍制度,落实公民一律平等的宪法权利,保障公民的自由迁徙权。

9、结社自由:保障公民的结社自由权,将现行的社团登记审批制改为备案制。开放党禁,以宪法和法律规范政党行为,取消一党垄断执政特权,确立政党活动自由和公平竞争的原则,实现政党政治正常化和法制化。

10、集会自由:和平集会、游行、示威和表达自由,是宪法规定的公民基本自由,不应受到执政党和政府的非法干预与违宪限制。

11、言论自由:落实言论自由、出版自由和学术自由,保障公民的知情权和监督权。制订《新闻法》和《出版法》,开放报禁,废除现行《刑法》中的“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”条款,杜绝以言治罪。

12、宗教自由:保障宗教自由与信仰自由,实行政教分离,宗教信仰活动不受政府干预。审查并撤销限制或剥夺公民宗教自由的行政法规、行政规章和地方性法规;禁止以行政立法管理宗教活动。废除宗教团体(包括宗教活动场所)必经登记始获合法地位的事先许可制度,代之以无须任何审查的备案制。

13、公民教育:取消服务于一党统治、带有浓厚意识形态色彩的政治教育与政治考试,推广以普世价值和公民权利为本的公民教育,确立公民意识,倡导服务社会的公民美德。

14、财产保护:确立和保护私有财产权利,实行自由、开放的市场经济制度,保障创业自由,消除行政垄断;设立对最高民意机关负责的国有资产管理委员会,合法有序地展开产权改革,明晰产权归属和责任者;开展新土地运动,推进土地私有化,切实保障公民尤其是农民的土地所有权。

15、财税改革:确立民主财政和保障纳税人的权利。建立权责明确的公共财政制度构架和运行机制,建立各级政府合理有效的财政分权体系;对赋税制度进行重大改革,以降低税率、简化税制、公平税负。非经社会公共选择过程,民意机关决议,行政部门不得随意加税、开征新税。通过产权改革,引进多元市场主体和竞争机制,降低金融准入门槛,为发展民间金融创造条件,使金融体系充分发挥活力。

16、社会保障:建立覆盖全体国民的社会保障体制,使国民在教育、医疗、养老和就业等方面得到最基本的保障。

17、环境保护:保护生态环境,提倡可持续发展,为子孙后代和全人类负责;明确落实国家和各级官员必须为此承担的相应责任;发挥民间组织在环境保护中的参与和监督作用。

18、联邦共和:以平等、公正的态度参与维持地区和平与发展,塑造一个负责任的大国形象。维护香港、澳门的自由制度。在自由民主的前提下,通过平等谈判与合作互动的方式寻求海峡两岸和解方案。以大智慧探索各民族共同繁荣的可能途径和制度设计,在民主宪政的架构下建立中华联邦共和国。

19、转型正义:为历次政治运动中遭受政治迫害的人士及其家属,恢复名誉,给予国家赔偿;释放所有政治犯和良心犯,释放所有因信仰而获罪的人员;成立真相调查委员会,查清历史事件的真相,厘清责任,伸张正义;在此基础上寻求社会和解。

四、结语

中国作为世界大国,作为联合国安理会五个常任理事国之一和人权理事会的成员,理应为人类和平事业与人权进步做出自身的贡献。但令人遗憾的是,在当今世界的所有大国里,唯独中国还处在威权主义政治生态中,并由此造成连绵不断的人权灾难和社会危机,束缚了中华民族的自身发展,制约了人类文明的进步——这种局面必须改变!政治民主化变革不能再拖延下去。

为此,我们本着勇于践行的公民精神,公布《零八宪章》。我们希望所有具有同样危机感、责任感和使命感的中国公民,不分朝野,不论身份,求同存异,积极参与到公民运动中来,共同推动中国社会的伟大变革,以期早日建成一个自由、民主、宪政的国家,实现国人百余年来锲而不舍的追求与梦想。

Digital Archives In Memoriam 9/11 WTC Creative Memorial Original Architecture Design Resurrection with noncontroversial docdrama shooting gateaway to hell firefighters Inside 9/11 WTC Ground Zero

The WTC principal master planner spiritual memory 9/11 resurrection Architect Daniel Libeskinds lectures on Monument and Memory Architecture won with his proposal for creative rebuilding original WTC twin skyscrappers digital archives cinematic landscape designed along with architects Calatrava, Foster and Rogers with WTC site developer
http://www.xmail.net/technologos/Asilver.html
DANIEL LIBESKIND describes Master Plan Architecture of WTC Ground Zero Rebuild

ORIGINAL WTC ARCHITECT MINORU YAMASAKI CREATED HIS DESIGN BY REINVENTING PROTOTYPES OF ADMIRED ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE
http://www.xmail.net/technologos/Ayama.html For 29 years — from the time the first World Trade Center tower was completed in 1972 to Sept. 11, 2001, when two hijacked planes leveled the buildings — there was little general awareness that New York’s tallest and most visible towers reflected Yamasaki’s interest in Islamic architecture.
Yamasaki described WTC plaza as “a mecca, a great relief from the narrow streets and sidewalks of the surrounding Wall Street area.” Yamasaki replicated the plan of Mecca’s courtyard by creating a vast delineated square, isolated from the city’s bustle by low colonnaded structures and capped by two enormous, perfectly square towers—minarets, really. Yamasaki’s courtyard mimicked Mecca’s assemblage of holy sites—the Qa’ba (a cube) containing the sacred stone, what some believe is the burial site of Hagar and Ishmael, and the holy spring—by including several sculptural features, including a fountain, and he anchored the composition in a radial circular pattern, similar to Mecca’s. FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT THE ARCHITECT INTERVIEW ON HIS ARCHITECTURE http://www.xmail.net/technologos/Awright.html Frank Lloyd Wright, America’s most noteworthy architect, designed the civic center in the late 1950s after going to Baghdad for a project commissioned by Iraq’s ruler, King Faisal II.
Wright, who also visited Iran, had a lifelong interest in Islamic architecture and a deep admiration for Persian aesthetics. He made no secret of this, but 40 years after his death, this side of Wright has been almost lost in the United States’ collective memory of him.

USSR Military Cadets Dissident Saga memoirs work in progress creating video archives of 1960-70 Moscow Dissidents, not yet final editor cut Interview https://vimeo.com/13867758 in the process to create original video archives on vimeo http://www.vimeo.com/technologos
intellectual dissent history and underground culture in USSR begins with memoirs saga of military cadets and (narration in original russian) https://vimeo.com/technologos/videos ith the relevant texts published in russian with english rough translation pieces below http://bit.ly/9dgcl5

In custody since March 3, 1962

The crime under Art. Art. 70, Part 1, and 72 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR (3).
Preliminary investigations established that:
that the defendants Balashov (4) and Murzhenko, being anti-Soviet dissident and with the policy of the CPSU and the Soviet government, in late 1961

3 Article 70-I, Part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic (RSFSR Criminal Code) provides for punishment for “agitation and propaganda being carried out in order to undermine or weaken the Soviet regime – from six months to seven years in prison camps for special treatment with further reference to five years or without it. Article 72-I of the Criminal Code provides punishment for group action in the commission of a particularly dangerous state crimes, including – for the group of advocacy nature.

4 Victor Balashov – a graduate of Suvorov Military School, classmate A. Murzhenko of the Moscow Finance Institute and organizer of the underground “Union freedom of the mind. During the completion of the camp period running (see below), for which he was convicted for an additional three years. After his release in 1972, left the Soviet Union. Now lives in the U.S..

by agreement created an illegal anti-Soviet organization called the Union Of Freedom Reason. ”

When you create an organization they set out to fight against the Communist Party and Soviet government, and held the CPSU and the Soviet government interventions were intended to create your own program and statutes involved in the organization to new members and carry out anti-Soviet activities by conducting anti-Soviet agitation and anti-Soviet flyers content.

In furtherance of their criminal intentions Balashov and Murzhenko dragged into a criminal organization in November 1961 the defendant Fedorov, and in early 1962 the defendant Kuzmin. At the same time, they, with the participation of Fedorov, in late 1961 began to manufacture the anti-Soviet leaflets and accompanying letters to her on behalf of the named “Union of Freedom of Mind” by assigning the term spread it before the election of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR in 1962 .. . Once the text of the leaflets Balashov in February 1962, rented a typewriter, on which your home has printed the text of the anti-Soviet leaflets.
Photographer’s work in the 5 th publising house – Voyenizdat Ministry of Defense, Balashov, using his official position, in February 1962, multiplied by car “offset duplicator” anti-Soviet leaflets text of about 400 units (units) and brought them to his home. After breeding leaflets Balashov and Murzhenko dragged into established their anti-Soviet organization accused Kuzmin, who participated in the finalization of the texts accompanying letters to the anti-Soviet leaflets. They reported on the establishment of anti-Soviet organization in the Soviet Union, its objectives, contained defamatory allegations in respect of existing in the Soviet system …
In accordance with the developed plan, February 22
1962 Balashov, Murzhenko Fedorov, and Kuzmin, distributed over 350 flyers and a few cover letters by mail to the addresses of major industrial companies, newspapers, government agencies Soviet countries themselves directly distributed leaflets at universities in Moscow.
Each of them spread anti-Soviet leaflets and letters with the leaflets: Balashov – 60 100 leaflets and envelopes Murzhenko – 20 flyers and 20 envelopes, Fedorov – 4 leaflets and 20 envelopes and Kuzmin – 30 flyers and 80 envelopes.
In addition, the Polytechnical Museum during the discussion Balashov, Murzhenko and Fedorov sent two leaflets in the Presidency, and a leaflet handed Murzhenko gr. Alekseev. Six leaflets handed Murzhenko citizen Glazkova and 10 leaflets handed gr. Lookout for the spread in Kiev …

Под стражей с 3 марта 1962 г.

В преступлении, предусмотренном ст. ст. 70, ч. 1 и 72 УК РСФСР 3.

Материалами предварительного следствия установлено:

что подсудимые Балашов 4 и Мурженко, будучи антисоветски настроенными и несогласными с политикой, проводимой КПСС и Советским правительством, в конце 1961 года

3 Статья 70-я, часть 1-я, Уголовного кодекса Российской со­ветской федеративной социалистической республики (УК РСФСР) предусматривает наказание за “агитацию и пропаганду, проводимую в целях подрыва или ослабления советской власти” – от полугода до семи лет заключения в лагерях особого режима с последующей ссылкой до пяти лет или без таковой. Статья 72-я Уголовного ко­декса предусматривает наказание за групповые действия при совер­шении всех особо опасных государственных преступлений, в том числе – за групповые действия агитационно-пропагандистского ха­рактера.

4 Виктор Балашов (он же упоминавшийся выше “Вик”) — выпускник суворовского училища, сокурсник А. Мурженко по Московскому финансовому институту и организатор подпольного “Союза свободы разума”. Во время отбытия лагерного срока бежал (см. ниже), за что был осужден дополнительно на три года. После освобождения в 1972 году выехал из СССР. Ныне живет в США.

по договоренности между собой создали нелегальную антисоветскую организацию под названием “Союз свободы разума”.

При создании организации они ставили своей целью вести борьбу против КПСС и Советского правительства, а также проводимых КПСС и Советским правительством мероприятий, ставили целью создать свою программу и устав, вовлекать в указанную организацию новых членов и проводить антисоветскую деятельность путем проведения антисоветской агитации и распространения листовок антисоветского содержания.

В целях осуществления своих преступных замыслов Балашов и Мурженко вовлекли в преступную организацию в ноябре 1961 г. подсудимого Федорова, а в начале 1962 г. подсудимого Кузьмина. В то же время они, при участии Федорова, в конце 1961 г. приступили к изготовлению антисоветской листовки и сопроводительных писем к ней от имени названного ими “Союза свободы разума”, назначив срок распространения ее перед выборами Верховного Совета СССР в 1962 г. …После составления текста листовки Балашов в феврале 1962 г. взял напрокат пишущую машинку, на которой у себя дома отпечатал текст антисоветской листовки.

Работая фотографом в 5-й типографии Воениздата Министерства Обороны СССР, Балашов, используя служебное положение, в феврале 1962 г. размножил на машине “Ротапринт” текст антисоветской листовки в количестве около 400 штук (экземпляров) и принес их к себе домой. После размножения листовки Балашов и Мурженко вовлекли в созданную ими антисоветскую организацию подсудимого Кузьмина, который принял участие в окончательной отработке текстов сопроводительных антисоветских писем к листовкам. В них сообщалось о создании антисоветской организации в СССР, ее задачах, содержались клеветнические измышления в отношении существующего в СССР строя…

В соответствии с разработанным планом, 22 февраля

1962 г. Балашов, Мурженко, Федоров и Кузьмин распространили более 350 листовок и несколько сопроводительных писем почтой в адреса крупных промышленных предприятий, редакций газет, правительственных учреждений советской страны, и сами непосредственно распространили листовки в высших учебных заведениях г. Москвы.

Каждый из них распространил антисоветских листовок и писем с листовками: Балашов – 60 листовок и 100 конвертов, Мурженко – 20 листовок и 20 конвертов, Федоров — 4 листовки и 20 конвертов и Кузьмин — 30 листовок и 80 конвертов.

Кроме того, в Политехническом музее во время дискуссии Балашов, Мурженко и Федоров направили две листовки в Президиум, а одну листовку Мурженко передал гр. Алексееву. Шесть листовок Мурженко передал гражданке Глазковой и 10 листовок передал гр. Смотрову для распространения в г. Киеве…”

Case № 28/62 L

Sentence

In the name of the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic July 20, 1962 in Moscow.

Judicial board on criminal cases of the Moscow City Court, composed of:
Presiding Klimova

People’s assessors Bychkova and Gerasimova

with the Attorney Molochkov,

considered in a closed court hearing the case against …

Based on the above and following the article. Art. 303 and 315 CCrP

To Sentence
Balashov Victor Alekseevich, Murzhenko Alexei G., Fedorov Yuri Pavlovich and Kuzmin Sergei Nikolaevich Art. Art. 70 and 72 of Part 1 of the RSFSR Criminal Code and has determined them to punishment:

Balashov Victor A. – imprisonment for a term of seven years of sentence in a maximum security units.

Murzhenko Alexey – imprisonment for a term of six years from the sentence to be served in the offices of strict regime.

Fedorov, Yuri Pavlovich, – imprisonment for a term of five years of sentence in a maximum security units.

Kuzmin Sergey – imprisonment for a term of four years of sentence in a maximum security units.

The measure of restraint Balashov, Murzhenko, Fedorov and Kuzmin leave detention.

Дело № 28/62 л

ПРИГОВОР

Именем Российской Советской Федеративной Социалистической Республики 20 июля 1962 г. г. Москва.

Судебная коллегия по уголовным делам Московского городского суда в составе:

председательствующего Климова,

народных заседателей Бычкова и Герасимова

с участием прокурора Молочкова,

рассмотрев в закрытом судебном заседании дело по обвинению…

.На основании изложенного и руководствуясь ст. ст. 303 и 315 УПК РСФСР

ПРИГОВОРИЛА:

Признать виновными Балашова Виктора Алексеевича, Мурженко Алексея Григорьевича, Федорова Юрия Павловича и Кузьмина Сергея Николаевича по ст. ст. 70 ч.1 и 72 УК РСФСР и определила им меру наказания:

Балашову Виктору Алексеевичу — лишение свободы сроком на семь лет с отбыванием наказания в подразделениях строгого режима.

Мурженко Алексею Григорьевичу — лишение свободы сроком на шесть лет с отбыванием наказания в подразделениях строгого режима.

Федорову Юрию Павловичу — лишение свободы сроком на пять лет с отбыванием наказания в подразделениях строгого режима.

Кузьмину Сергею Николаевичу – лишение свободы сроком на четыре года с отбыванием наказания в подразделениях строгого режима.

Мерой пресечения Балашову, Мурженко, Федорову и Кузьмину оставить содержание под стражей.

Julian Assange Wikileaks Launched Afghan War Chaos Constructive Critique with Chronicles that NY Times, The Guardian and Der Spiegel
has published this Sunday. View Cinematic portrait Wikileaks editor Julian Assange who launched triple global media release of Afghan War Logs While White House officials denied that the Obama administration had presented a misleading portrait of the war in Afghanistan but as the early-viewing New York Times reports, WikiLeaks presents a new depth of detail about how the U.S. military has seen, for six years, the depths of ISI facilitation of the Afghan insurgency. For instance: a three-star Pakistani general active during the 80s-era U.S.-Pakistani-Saudi sponsorship of the anti-Soviet insurgency, Hamid Gul, allegedly met with insurgent leaders in South Waziristan in January 2009 to plot vengeance for the drone-inflicted death of an al-Qaeda operative. White House officials were offended by an interview Mr. Assange conducted with Der Spiegel, you can read below The Obama administration will go through the motions of hunting down the leaker and denouncing the leaks as treason.

Do you think that the publication of this data will influence
political decision-makers?
Assange: Yes. This material shines light on the everyday
brutality and squalor of war. The archive will change public
opinion and it will change the opinion of people in positions of
political and diplomatic influence.

SPIEGEL: During the Vietnam War, US President Richard Nixon once
called Daniel Elsberg, the leaker of the Pentagon Papers, the
most dangerous man in America. Are you today’s most dangerous
man or the most endangered?

Assange: The most dangerous men are those who are in charge of
war. And they need to be stopped. If that makes me dangerous in
their eyes, so be it.

SPIEGEL: You could have started a company in Silicon Valley and
lived in a home in Palo Alto with a swimming pool. Why did you
decide to do the WikiLeaks project instead?

Assange: We all only live once. So we are obligated to make good
use of the time that we have and to do something that is
meaningful and satisfying. This is something that I find
meaningful and satisfying. That is my temperament. I enjoy
creating systems on a grand scale, and I enjoy helping people
who are vulnerable. And I enjoy crushing bastards. So it is
enjoyable work.
Julian Assange did make a surprise appearance at the TED Global conference at Oxford University two weeks ago Chris Anderson, TED’s founder, interviews him onstage and talks through Wikileak’s mission, structure and history and was asking if it’s fair to say that Wikileaks has released more secret documents that the collective enterprise of journalism, Julian allows that it’s an embarrassment for journalists to have such a comparison made. http://bit.ly/9WFT67
Afghanistan expert and author Stephen Grey has analysed the war logs data and calculated the number of deaths revealed in the report. Here is the breakdown:
Enemy killed: 15,506 Civilians killed: 4,232
Afghan Army (ANA) killed: 3,819 Nato forces killed: 1,138